Cyberdevil's art Reviews on Newgrounds

[Sexy Lady]

Pretty good! That textured corsette looks a bit odd on contrast to the painted panties though, seems like they'd be better wit a consistent style. As for the skin tone, that part is just perfect. Nice work!

-cd-

[Lindsey Stirling1]

Never heard of her, but this looks great, it's smooth and detailed, and looks pretty realistic too. Nice work on the shadow of the glasses especially, wouldn't that'd look so natural like that. Keep it going!

-cd-

[BoredLooney Smiley]

Interesting idea, but the colors are pretty trippy. It does go with the whole party theme of the right side though. Keep it going!

-cd-

[The Girls]

Looks good, and they're much more lumniscent and dimensional than they were in the series. The outlines, the shadow, the glow, it all creates pretty living images of them, but what's up with that center haircut? Is that really how it always looked? Keep up the good work!

-cd-

[Status Increased]

What's with the missing nipples? It feels like there should at least be some visible part of them somewhere on that gigantic chest area. Nice work on making them perceptable, great coloring, lighting, etc. Keep it going!

-cd-

[Pandora]

Nice work! I don't recognize the character, but she looks great. The colorful background splotches are a perfect background, futuristic and creative at the same time, like mechanical nature. Great lighting, shading, everything. Great work!

-cd-

[Slump]

Well this was bizarre. It's interesting how many different beings and forms you can see in this, though the titties definitely make the one bent-over woman the main focus. In a way it's like two characters joining at the neck, but there's a lot more to see within the scribble. Interesting work!

-cd-

[Monotony]

Just the world, the grim truth, one falls behind and nobody even notices, everybody goes on with their daily lives, everything is the same as it was, no change, no improvement. Nice work!

-cd-

[Mona Lisa]

You mean the woman? :P Not sure how realistic it looks, but it looks good. The face is rather wide though, no visible ear even though there seems to be space for at least the contours... and no eyebrows? Didn't the original have any? Overall it's a nice portrait though.

-cd-

oriapheu responds:

I meant, to DaVinci lol..The original doesn't seem to have any discernible eyebrows or ear, and I thought that adding them would not be correct...thank you for the great review though, I'm always open to criticism, I always want to know what I can improve on :)