@Kiwi @Cyberdevil @Cyberdevil Honduras was beautiful! Pics in the wanderlusts thread and on my insta!
Bamboo Shoots!
Age 35, Male
Poet/Designer/Etc
ACCOMPLISHED
Sweden
Joined on 1/17/04
@Kiwi @Cyberdevil @Cyberdevil Honduras was beautiful! Pics in the wanderlusts thread and on my insta!
How many clubs have you started! :O On my way...
@Kiwi @Cyberdevil @Cyberdevil hahaha... Two... I think??
Aha. XD The concert one wasn't yours...? Or maybe not a club. Anyhow: I can deal with this. Two's not too unmanageable...
@Kiwi @Cyberdevil @Cyberdevil that ones just a list in general!
Got it.
ever seen Priest (2011)?
Ah I think you might've recommended me that one before. Think it might still be on my watchlist... or was it recommended? Good movie?
is the playlist panel broken, or has it not been fully implemented yet?
https://tomfulp.newgrounds.com/playlists
https://cyberdevil.newgrounds.com/playlists
Seems like it's working now...? Wonder what it looked like when you were linking to it...
it's just an empty panel for me: https://www.newgrounds.com/dump/draw/8856f256fa203ad41fa6c230f6cb7697
tried it on chrome and firefox, same result
Hmm! Seems others might see it the same way as you do: https://archive.is/gJgPV/image
...I can see my own fine, but I can't see Toms apparently. sooo maybe playlists just went private? What happens if you try making one of your own?
I wonder if this is intent8ional though...
that must be it, the playlists panel is private.
I still count it as a bug, because if it was meant to truly be private the button shouldn't be accessible to the public.
Yeah I think it might be, I seem to remember there being a page that listed ALL playlists too, though maybe that's gone now too.... you can sti8ll see individual ones though right? For example: https://www.newgrounds.com/playlists/view/fb650a1e5bc8c085495aa763f910a8be
...again also reminded of the fact you can't edit comments now. Wonder if that's a bug or a feature. These things need to be announced...
it's def. a bug as diminishes the quality of the site...and we used to be able to at one point
where you able to find the topics?
https://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/998501/1
https://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/1128764/1
From late 2008-2012, I think there was threads before that too, but I cannot locate them. It's a good bit of history, just needs more 'congrats to the winners' and less whining. Though I suppose the P-bot threads had their share of complaining back in the day...
You're right, asked Tom about it just nowand they're aware of it too. Hopefully a quick fix. Was going to link to his post but it's in the Supporter forum...
Ah no, thanks, skimmed the first pages but didn't see it there. Seems activity's dwindled hmm...
Haha yeah, not that the Congrats really contribute that much, but it keeps the hype up a bit. Been going through old P-Bot posts recently btw, there sure were a loooot of comments there back in the day, nice to see people like BomToons and Little-Rena being regulars in the conversations back in the day. Fun fact: thumbnails were apparently added in just roughly ten years ago now, before that it was all text.
Another typo reminds me: I asked about the edit comment thing too, and hopefully that'll get revisited in the future too. Seems they have their hands full with Ruffle stuff right now.
Hey can u link me a 5g doc again? Or send it to my inbox here? Im curious and wanna learn more because im realizing this shit is coming fast and communities that have no cell phone signals may be shrinking simultaneously and there are some ppl with serious conditions
Same one I link to in the sidebar? https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal
If you need something more specific I can go digging a bit. Dr. Mercola has some good summaries too (this wasn't the one I'd read before but seems legit, plenty more via search there): https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2019/06/05/technology-versus-humanity.aspx
...yeah the companies keep pushing for it and I don't think they really know what they're doing here. :/ It'll be hard to avoid even if you want to.
@Boss @Cyberdevil omg i didnt even notice the sidebar! Sorry LOL thank you for the link, we should be careful with new technology like we need to do experiments and verify what it does
No worries man. XD For sure. Lately it feels like technological progress is speeding up to the point people almost don't even care about the risks, like it's the thrill of potential innovational danger. Like Elon Musk says: what if we're just the organic bootloader for AI? The way we keep pushing for these things...
But anyway that's a different topic. Disappointed he's actually on the forefront for launching all these 5G satellites though. He used to seem like the perfect visionary, everything he did somehow for the betterment of humankind.
@Boss @Cyberdevil @Cyberdevil i mean, i heard criticisms about him doing things sort of as exploits a few years ago for media attention but, i dont know details i think it was the submarine thing. I dont really know too much about him but have heard of his tunnels and know he made the self driving car, i think everyone we have doing all of these things will always have balances to their character that makes us contemplate... it would be cool if he could find a way to make sure the 5g signals dont spread like an infinite cloud but goes thru concerted restricted channels in the air atleast.. i wonder if he would think of those kinds of things
Oh a submarine thing! I hadn't heard of that at all. Need to look that up. That's true, no one's perfect, though when he was starting with Tesla, with electric cars, and solar panels, and giving out monorail designs for free to revolutionize public transport... I really liked that side. :) If you haven't seen the solar roof btw it's pretty cool: https://www.tesla.com/solarroof
Yeah it would be... I hope so. Maybe he knows more about what he's doing than all of us. The links I sent you both mention the dangers of shooting up satellites into our magnetosphere though, how it might not just disrupt weather forecast technology but life as we know it... we just haven't ever had this type of technology up there before, and 20,000 satellites no less... feels dangerous. Hope he just hasn't given up on the world entirely, and this is all part a plan to speed up colonization of Mars... or something. I really wonder what he's thinking with this.
Dr. Mercola Quackola?? I will erect giant 5G towers worldwide just to spite him (not saying he's wrong on this issue though)
You don't trust the dude?
I agree with 'Proper nutrition, not medicine, is the key to good health.' motto and some of his holistic principles, but the guy is a snake oil salesman, makes egregious claims, even if you're not down with consensus medical decisions, it's hard for me to trust someone who shills his books and products all over his social media
Hmm I've yet to read something he says that doesn't make sense to me, but that said I definitely don't know everything about him, haven't read his books; haven't researched his claims. Have tried some of his bars and toothpaste though, and those were great (all great ingredients too)...
Everybody's got to make a living though right? As long as he's advocating a healthy lifestyle it seems like a good way to go about it.
I don't know...doctors make good money from just running a practice and seeing patients, but he's a multi-millionaire with a fear-mongering schtick. It's like the TV pastors that have private jets and mansions. They become proselytizers and not preachers.
Ah so he is a real doctor too... thought it was more so a degree, or his previous occupation before this online thing. TV pastors don't really contribute to peoples well being, though. Mercola however: spreading good info, and you don't need to pay a thing to read it. Fear-mongering...? Strange how we get so different impressions here.
I feel like he's doing good deeds, large profits or no. As a traditional doctor you wouldn't have the same amount of reach as you would as a social presence like this. For good and bad of course. He'd better be saying the right things.
He's an osteopathic doctor, which doesn't have the same depth of training as a medical doctor, but I wasn't trying to judge :P
well, porn sites spread erotic images of good looking people plastered with penis enlargement ads, Mercola's has turmeric articles (which is a great spice) with equivocal '5 FACTS DOCTORS DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW'. I prefer sites with peer-reviewed research that links too related articles and dissenting opinions, not Buzzfeed-esque clickbait...
Fear-mongering: not on Alex Jones level, but absolutely. Nothing that the first page of google results won't detail if you search his name.
Alright, good to know. :)
The clickbait may be real, but I think the fundamental reason our views differ here is because I'm already into most of the stuff he posts about before he posts it. It's more so re-affirming to read than something I read and instantly believe. Maybe everything he says isn't correct but which source is? Is the problem more so the presentation than the content though, in your view? Anything you personally really don't agree with?
Hmm not sure I want to go down that rabbit hole... seems to be a lot of FDA related claims on the first page, and similar, if possible to an even lesser degree than our own local FDA alternative: I really don't trust the FDA. That people can't advocate for health benefits unless those benefits are scientifically proven is a major flaw in modern society IMO. It's not that I don't believe in science, but when the majority of all research is industry funded I don't as easily believe science is always without bias and/or complete.
Whatever happened to the freedom to live your life according to the practices you believe in, rather than those presented by the wealthiest entities out there? All scientifically approved cures require massive funding to get through, and yet there are alternative natural sources we've been consuming for the past millennia or so that you're not allowed to vouch for when it's a company claim. As far as I'm concerned the more alternative lifestyle sources and products out there the better. If they don't work it'll be uncovered; if they do people will respond positive. As long as production is safe and tested it's all good to me.
But maybe I'm getting OT here. I like the dude. Will read up though and maybe form a more researched opinion. New question: what do you think about Dr. Axe? If anything? Hopefully not also a name related to quackery over there...?
yep, everyone has their biases, and some have bad practices, and the FDA is no exception. Dr. Mercola is a known AIDS denier, propagates vaccine hysteria, and in general enables chemophobia. It might be okay to follow his practices if you're generally healthy, but when afflicted with a serious illness what he preaches may no longer be all that innocuous. Also, I take offense to general big pharma conspiracies and the notion that 'conventional' doctors are hiding something from the public, when many deal with dying patients and are inspired to do what they do because of the sickly. But yeah, I'm not against alternative medicine in entirety or shaming people for their health decisions especially if they are happy and healthy, or trying to turn you against Dr. Mercola. Just saw his name and thought I'd voice my personal displeasure with a humorous twist.
Oh damn AIDS, wonder why he thinks that... I'm very much against ingesting any unnecessary vaccines and chemicals myself though. I don't believe regular doctors are in on any kind of conspiracy, most are probably helping people as best they can; often doing so at personal risk no less, but big pharma: keeping people alive for as long as possible, while still keeping them reliant on meds to do so: that's what they make a living of after all. The same could be said of any alternatives of course, but looking at the constant lawsuits they face, with penalties that don't even phaze them in regard to how much money they're already making off of the meds they produce, and keep producing, aware of whatever severe side-effects they might have... I'm very anti big pharma too. I believe in doctors but I wish they were also educated on traditional medicine and nutrition to a higher degree. Maybe education's different in the US, but here they don't even know you can't measure magnesium levels reliably without taking a blood sample, or that it has an equal if not even more important effect on bone density that calcium (and that calcium can actually have a detrimental effect on its own), or that there is such a thing as both negative AND positive cholesterol, among so much else. Maybe some do, but education seems inconsistent and often very opinionated.
My grandma would've probably still been in good health if one particular doctor didn't cut out her B12 supplements since you just don't need those. Years later another one brought them back in, but by that point all too late. Cancer patients get recommended a sugar-rich diet as to feel more energetic even though research clearly shows that cancer feeds off sugar... I feel like I've just come to a point where it's difficult to trust a conventional doctor.
Aaah rant picks on too easily... sorry 'bout that. I understand your view though; don't mean to discredit those who really are doing the best they can, and for a cause greater than themselves no less. There's some things alternative medicine can't fix, like broken bones, and for such causes it's great regular hospitals exist. In my ideal world I envision all these institutions learning from each other though, focusing more on diet than medicine when it comes to common diseases, and striving to cure people with the least amount of artificial sustenance possible.
I envision schools not getting sponsored by pharma to the point their brands show up in their course literature, and doctors not being allowed to suggest unconventional cures if they do happen to be both safe and relevant. Why not homeopathy? As far as I know it hasn't killed anyone, contrary to many a more popular a cure. Even if it's all placebo it might be equally effective. Instead they're banning homeopathic medicine without evidence that it does any harm. People aren't really free to choose how to be cured anymore. Herbs like milk thistle (silymarin) are banned not because they're dangerous, but because they're too effective! Big pharma tried banning rose hip recently, as they wanted it to be prescription based too, but fortunately they didn't get that through. I hope we're an exceptionally bad example of these industries running rampant though... but so maybe you see why I side with alternative sources for these things. It feels like the pharma industry is simply based on profit, and all education influenced by ditto.
Ah man, that humorous twist. XD Do appreciate it. All info's good info, though I seem to get carried away a bit when this stuff comes up... hope you don't take any of the above personally.
playlist bug is fixed now
Nice. :)
Quisty
@Quisty @Cyberdevil @Cyberdevil no time for much but once kid is more independent then I can get back to hobbies.
Cyberdevil
Just a few years now hmm. :) Good luck. Raising potential world leader or great native creative with unfathomable influence there.